Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: EternalVigilance
Correct. I believe Idaho and Utah were required to forsake plural marriage in perpetuity due to a large Mormon population. Oklahoma was required to do the same due to a large Native American population. Arizona had both.

Existing plural marriages were grandfathered in. Oklahoma and Arizona, because they were among the last of the lower 48, had legal plural marriages on the books until the 1970s, when the last of the grandfathered marriage partners passed.

In short, a much longer precedent than the currently stylish gay marriages.

18 posted on 08/27/2014 7:50:20 PM PDT by Vigilanteman (Obama: Fake black man. Fake Messiah. Fake American. How many fakes can you fit in one Zer0?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]


To: Vigilanteman

Well, yeah! NEVER in history has the union of two men or two women been regarded as marriage. Yet, polygamy was, if not the norm, very popular in many cultures throughout history as well as many cultures today.


39 posted on 08/27/2014 9:07:49 PM PDT by Jim from C-Town (The government is rarely benevolent, often malevolent and never benign!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson