Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Nifster; muir_redwoods
Neither of the links you posted cites "examining death certificates and drawing conclusions" as a problem with the second-hand-smoke studies - nor even something those studies did at all.
43 posted on 08/27/2014 10:01:53 AM PDT by ConservingFreedom (A goverrnment strong enough to impose your standards is strong enough to ban them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]


To: ConservingFreedom

But if you had read any of the studies that were done about second hand smoke they were done that way. Just like the primary studies done on smoking. They scoured death certificates and even if a person had died of pneumonia or heart disease they were thrown into the smoking caused it category. You have to have been paying attention to the longitudinal studies


45 posted on 08/27/2014 9:00:16 PM PDT by Nifster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson