Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: TigersEye

These businesses are consciously considering the question, if a shooter starts shooting up the place, do we want any of our patrons to be armed?

By declaring know, they have unreasonably put their patrons in more danger.


49 posted on 08/23/2014 8:38:19 PM PDT by School of Rational Thought
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]


To: School of Rational Thought
The basic reasoning behind this legal decision has nothing to do with Gun Free Zones. It's based on liability due to foreknowledge. Signs or no signs it would put all owners of private property in jeopardy.

This is a socialist/communist wet dream.

51 posted on 08/23/2014 9:33:29 PM PDT by TigersEye ("No man left behind" means something different to 0bama.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson