Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: chessplayer

Given the “no firearms” signs, it wasn’t inevitable, but clearly an increased likelihood.


3 posted on 08/23/2014 1:01:13 PM PDT by lepton ("It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into"--Jonathan Swift)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: lepton

“Given the “no firearms” signs, it wasn’t inevitable, but clearly an increased likelihood.”

I carry a small, easily concealed gun. Nobody will know I have it unless I have to use it. In that event I’m guessing nobody will complain that I had it. Even so, my plan it to put it away and walk quietly to the door.


6 posted on 08/23/2014 1:06:26 PM PDT by Gen.Blather
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: lepton
Given the “no firearms” signs, it wasn’t inevitable, but clearly an increased likelihood.

In this case the business made a conscious decision to prevent someone from reasonably being able to protect themselves in a situation they clearly considered. Frankly, laws placing liability on those businesses should be pursued. It is a logical counterbalance against Moms Demand Action for Gun Sense in America.

48 posted on 08/23/2014 8:34:31 PM PDT by School of Rational Thought
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson