Furthermore, there is an element of inviting attack. In the past 40+ years every single mass shooting (with only one exception) has occurred in an area where private citizens are prevented from carrying firearms. That's a pretty convincing track record that disarming your patrons invites attack.
Hopefully a few big settlements (and thus a boost in liability insurance rates) will help convince business owners to take down these idiotic signs and reduce their liability.
“If business owners are going to take away my ability to defend myself and my family with their stupid “no firearms” signs then they take on the responsibility for reasonably assuring their customer’s safety to a similar degree. eg. post armed undercover security in every theater.
Furthermore, there is an element of inviting attack. In the past 40+ years every single mass shooting (with only one exception) has occurred in an area where private citizens are prevented from carrying firearms. That’s a pretty convincing track record that disarming your patrons invites attack.
Hopefully a few big settlements (and thus a boost in liability insurance rates) will help convince business owners to take down these idiotic signs and reduce their liability.”
WELL SAID!
Hopefully a few big settlements (and thus a boost in liability insurance rates) will help convince business owners
Uh,,,they will pass on those increased rates to the customers through increased prices for products. But sue em anyway. The theater owner was as guilty of murdering those people as the actual shooter. Shouldn’t the theater owner be spending life in prison?