(file photo)
Posted on 08/21/2014 5:42:57 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
RE: What are the odds that at least one would be Mohammed?
well, as fate would have it, TWO were named Mohammed...
Hamas chief honch0 lives in Dubai.
It was a 6 pack.
(file photo)
The US T-12 "Cloudmaker," 43,600 lbs.
Boom.
Ability to duck bombs crucial.
Good pay, excellent benefits
Multiple virgins available upon completion of tasks, or early termination.
Didn’t Obama just veto a shipment of missiles to Israel? If he does that, he won’t ship them anything to defend themselves. Israel has only the Lord God of Israel to do battle for them.
“-—mildly retarded frontline troops.” I guess you mean the inbred sister banging, goat humping sons of moohamed-—just to clarify and put a fine point on it?
What I want is a declaration of war. A real one, that Congress signs on to and that the American people have to live with. This war in the shadows stuff is garbage and sets a dangerous precedent. What should have happened? This post sums it up (not from me):
One of the problems with the “war on terror” is that “terror” is a tactic, not an enemy.
ISIS has declared itself to be the Islamic State. Now we have an entity against whom to wage war. It might be prudent to recognize the Islamic State and then, in the same breath, formally declare war on them. We will, of course, obey all of the laws of warfare including the Geneva Conventions on the treatment of POWs. (GWB was a fool not to have granted Al Qaeda POW status....) Of course, the Geneva Conventions require that combatants wear uniforms, and provides that combatants OUT of uniform may be summarily executed as spies or saboteurs. I’m not aware that any AQ fighters ever wore anything remotely resembling a uniform, so if we had recognized AQ as a Geneva Convention entity, we’d be absolutely within our rights to empty Gitmo with hangings. Which would have eliminated the declared “caliph”, who would have danced the Danny Deever.
Having formally declared war against IS, we could seize their commerce and funds, and then declare them as being guilty of war crimes, and exercised other powers that cannot really be used against an amorphous “terrorist” enemy.
Of course, this all assumes a leader who might have some intestinal fortitude, which our current “leader” does not.
************
Put the guy who said that in the Oval Office and let him run things for the next 4 years.
That’s what I’m talking about.
Mohammed. Break it down and it is not kosher.
“More ham, mom”!
Sounds like the intel was pretty good. Oh, Hamas ...! You have an inforrrrmerrrrr ....! ;)
Wonder what the Izzies used? Pro'lly Mavericks, they're big enough to do that. So are some French products.
Do it again, Yossi!
What do you call “three dead top Hamas commanders”?
A good start...
Now every member of Hamas needs to get the word immediately that it was the next three “top commanders” who informed.
Rinse. Repeat.
Eventually, no more Hamas!
More good news. Perhaps you would like to post this separately. Brand new info. Israel strikes back after days of rockets from Hamas.
My apologies. I went back to reread this link. At the very top was a May 2015 date, but when I looked further down, the dates were 2012 and 2013. Why the heck put today’s date on something 3 years old???
I would assume that even in a cesspool like Gaza, there are some decent and brave human beings who realize that helping Israel to weaken Hamas is a moral thing to do.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.