Skip to comments.
The Truth About Libertarians, Police and Ferguson's Fury
Fox News ^
| August 20, 2014
| John Stossel
Posted on 08/20/2014 1:24:46 PM PDT by nickcarraway
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-48 last
To: nickcarraway
That may well mean he was violent and dangerous, but even violent people should be brought to trial, not gunned down.
Then you go and personally get them with your non-violent means if you can Stossel.
Moron.
41
posted on
08/20/2014 3:21:56 PM PDT
by
Red in Blue PA
(When Injustice becomes Law, Resistance Becomes Duty.-Thomas Jefferson)
To: sergeantdave
If you have a bunch of commies and racist black pampers who want to kill my family, and a gang of thugs who want to destroy and steal my property, I want a professional,well-equipped, highly trained police force between me and that murderous mob.Those that would give up liberty for little, temporary security...I'm paraphrasing, of course. That, and the fact that, per the SCOTUS, LEO have NO obligation to protect you and yours. Their only obligation is to clean the mess up. Arm yourself. Prepare. The need for militarized LEO is highly debatable.
42
posted on
08/20/2014 3:43:27 PM PDT
by
dware
(3 prohibited topics in mixed company: politics, religion and operating systems...)
To: Responsibility2nd; Blackirish
Oh R2nd signed up alright..but I traded him for a 7th round draft pick and a player to be named later. It just wasnt a good fit ;)
43
posted on
08/20/2014 4:08:07 PM PDT
by
bamahead
(Few men desire liberty; most men wish only for a just master. -- Sallust)
To: nickcarraway
It's a cryin' damn shame that Stossel deigns to "represent" libertarian positions.
Most libertarians are not as stupid as he is. Nor as liberal.
But I repeat myself.
44
posted on
08/20/2014 4:11:30 PM PDT
by
Mariner
(War Criminal #18)
To: dware
“Those that would give up liberty for little, temporary security...I’m paraphrasing, of course. That, and the fact that, per the SCOTUS, LEO have NO obligation to protect you and yours.”
Oh, please, spare me stupid strawmen. If you want to go it alone against a mob without an organized and armed platoon, be my guest.
To: Abathar; Abcdefg; Abram; Abundy; albertp; Alexander Rubin; Allosaurs_r_us; amchugh; ...
46
posted on
08/20/2014 4:49:12 PM PDT
by
bamahead
(Few men desire liberty; most men wish only for a just master. -- Sallust)
To: Jagdgewehr
I would love to see what Stossel would do in a fight for his life. He is an idiot.
Has anyone mentioned that having Brown off the streets permanently may have saved other lives? How many other crimes would he have committed? I’m sick of this nonsense about the police. Let those who complain about them try doing the job.
47
posted on
08/20/2014 8:48:40 PM PDT
by
Pining_4_TX
(All those who were appointed to eternal life believed. Acts 13:48)
To: Red in Blue PA
What about when all Christians, gun-owners, or people who donated money to anti-gay=marriage causes are ruled to be violent criminals?
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-48 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
