Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: latina4dubya; chae
My experience says you are both wrong.

I was a witness, as a jump seat rider, to an aircraft accident. I gave what I thought was complete statement to NTSB. Nine months later, while prepping for Fed court testimony, I saw a diagram and transcript that almost made me feel like I was there again. I had read the NTSB conclusions, and was able to conclusively refute them, backed up by two of the three crew members. None of us had recollected the precise moment until reading the transcripts, which made us think "what was I seeing when that statement was made?"

Our testimony saved Delta about $10,000,000.

39 posted on 08/18/2014 7:07:45 PM PDT by diogenes ghost
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]


To: diogenes ghost; Secret Agent Man; chae
i stand by my statement... in gathering eyewitness testimony, there is something to be aware of called "Misinformation Effect..."

The misinformation effect happens when our recall of episodic memories becomes less accurate because of post-event information... the earliest recordings of an incident prove to be the most accurate due to a minimized misinformation effect...

and i believe that to be the case in this eyewitness's account of the Michael Brown shooting... her story is being customized to fit the information she has been exposed to since the incident...

43 posted on 08/19/2014 7:54:31 AM PDT by latina4dubya
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson