Those are damnable lies, and you are a contemptuous little b-st-rd for saying it, because you know they are lies. The rage is not mysterious. Many people get enraged at two legged vermin who peddle lies for the express purpose of distorting an argument. And there is not one single syllable of mine you can ever find to back up your preposterous taradiddle. Not one.
As for the points you made in the above post: I never have and probably never will support a libertarian for office. Maybe in an oddball protest vote situation, but not really support. You have a point on the gay marriage, which is why I did not respond. I told old3030 what I thought the proper libertarian response should be on that, but that many libertarians did not take that stance. As for the Roe V Wade point you made…not sure how that has anything to do with anything, and not sure it's true, but I have no problem with it. Your damnable lies are what irritate and aggrevate.
Your attempts to soft peddle libertarianism is what set you off on me, on this very thread.
As far as your social liberalism and the homosexual agenda, you have been dressed down for that before, by FR management.
There is no reason for you to have hijacked your own thread as you have with these incredible nasty personal attacks, social conservatism and conservatism is what this site is about, you can’t attack all of us constantly.