Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Kennard
Neither the date of the 3rd Courts decision nor the outcome of that decision were relevant. The case would be appealed by the losing side whatever the decision was.

So, the key date is the date that that State Court of Criminal Appeals would hear the case.

99 posted on 08/18/2014 2:51:45 AM PDT by Ben Ficklin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies ]


To: Ben Ficklin
the key date is the date that that State Court of Criminal Appeals would hear the case

That was June 14, 2014. However, "If the court overrules the previous appeals court decision, DeLay's attorney, Brian Wice, still has one appeal left with the original appellate court in Austin."

The result, a good one, is that Travis County is now picking up a trimmed-down tab for their Public Integrity (Political Prosecution) Unit, forcing them to lay off ten staffers and reduce their case load. Cost was no object when the whole state was paying for it. Now Travis County must put its money where its mouth is.

This is a much better outcome than leaving the burden on State taxpayers and only getting a two-year DA appointment before the County elects another Ronnie Earle.

If what you are saying was in fact part of the motivation for the veto, I sure wouldn't be talking about it with Perry facing a criminal indictment over the same facts. It sounds, however, like some speculation from last June.

101 posted on 08/18/2014 12:27:07 PM PDT by Praxeologue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson