Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Now FedEx is supposed to open each package, check with each sender and recipient and if they find medication, they need to demand a prescription, then check and make sure the prescription is valid? And they are supposed to enforce laws?

In the meantime the US government can't keep tons of illicit drugs like cocaine and so on from getting into the country.

1 posted on 08/15/2014 4:12:08 PM PDT by Innovative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Innovative

Eric Holder doing a Jesse Jackson?


2 posted on 08/15/2014 4:13:13 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet (The most dangerous man to any government is the man who is able to think things out for himself.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Innovative

Earlier article (July 2014):

FedEx Accused of Conspiracy to Distribute Prescription Drugs for Online Pharmacies

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3181814/posts

“Federal Express was indicted Thursday on federal charges alleging that it distributed prescription drugs and other controlled substances to people that the company knew had no prescriptions on behalf of illegal Internet pharmacies.

“We want to be clear what’s at stake here: The government is suggesting that FedEx assume criminal responsibility for the legality of the contents of the millions of packages that we pick up and deliver every day,” said Patrick Fitzgerald, a senior FedEx official. “We are a transportation company — we are not law enforcement. We have no interest in violating the privacy of our customers. We continue to stand ready and willing to support and assist law enforcement. We cannot, however, do the job of law enforcement ourselves.”


3 posted on 08/15/2014 4:13:45 PM PDT by Innovative ("Winning isn't everything, it's the only thing." -- Vince Lombardi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Innovative

Nothing to do with the failing USPS?


4 posted on 08/15/2014 4:14:35 PM PDT by RushIsMyTeddyBear (Illegals Are Getting Flat Screet TV's....NOT TB Screenings!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Innovative

How is a company charged with a crime? It says Fed X faces fines. What? No prison time for Fed X?


5 posted on 08/15/2014 4:19:41 PM PDT by Graybeard58 ( A feast is made for laughter, and wine maketh merry: but money answereth all things. Eccl 10,v 19)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Innovative

Which political party does FedEx give the most in donations too......

Microsoft solved its govt problems by donating to Dems and their causes.


9 posted on 08/15/2014 4:40:14 PM PDT by RginTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Innovative

I do not know how they could possibly convict FedX for this. But I do know that for years, FedX cooperated with Federal, State and local investigators. They would cooperate by allowing access to their hubs to have drug dogs conduct sniffs of suspicious packages. They would allow use of their vehicles and uniforms to make controlled deliveries of said packages to make a bust.

I strongly suspect the Feds just put an end to that cooperation.


12 posted on 08/15/2014 4:58:02 PM PDT by henkster (Do I really need a sarcasm tag?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Innovative

I can tell you from my experience as a former banker that FedGov wants business to be a law enforcement agency, and if you don’t play ball you’ll find yourself in the dock.


13 posted on 08/15/2014 5:01:28 PM PDT by clintonh8r (It's possible to love your country and hate your government. I'm proof of it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Innovative

Where I live the addicts used to chase the FedEx truck each morning when it came over the bridge. Whenever the truck stopped the junkies would mob the driver demanding that he check his manifest to see if he had their delivery. FedEx, at least temporarily, stopped delivering packages for several of these shady pharmacies. This was four or five years ago.


19 posted on 08/15/2014 5:27:42 PM PDT by Brad from Tennessee (A politician can't give you anything he hasn't first stolen from you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Innovative

Why does the government get to determine what kind of pharmaceuticals we take? It’s none of their business. These laws need to be repealed.


24 posted on 08/15/2014 6:11:46 PM PDT by montag813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Innovative

IS THIS perhaps an assault on free enterprise to favor a government postal service in deep doo doo financially?


27 posted on 08/15/2014 6:43:06 PM PDT by rockinqsranch ((Dems, Libs, Socialists, call 'em what you will. They ALL have fairies livin' in their trees.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Innovative
Obama Bagged $18 Million In Corporate, Special Interest Cash For Second Inauguration
breitbart.com ^ | April 29, 2013 | Wynston Hall

"Obama’s big money corporate donors included:...FedEx--$500,000"


28 posted on 08/15/2014 8:25:12 PM PDT by familyop (We Baby Boomers are croaking in an avalanche of corruption smelled around the planet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Innovative

Yet another bogus Marxist legalism from the most lawless administration in the history of the United States.

What a crock.


33 posted on 08/15/2014 9:21:26 PM PDT by Jack Hammer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Innovative
"Controlled substances" are serious stuff. "...pharmacies which had been the subject of criminal prosecutions for supplying drugs without prescriptions..."--also serious.

Controlled substance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
"In the U.S., the DEA is responsible for suppressing illegal drug use and distribution by enforcing the Controlled Substances Act...Substances are classified according to schedules and consist primarily of potentially psychoactive substances. The controlled substances do not include many prescription items such as antibiotics.[2]

Schedules of controlled substances
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


34 posted on 08/15/2014 9:23:08 PM PDT by familyop (We Baby Boomers are croaking in an avalanche of corruption smelled around the planet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Innovative

See what happens when you don’t pay enough protection money to the Federal government?


35 posted on 08/15/2014 9:43:06 PM PDT by kiryandil (making the jests that some FReepers aren't allowed to...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Innovative

The entire concept of private business, or even individual citizens, policing the activities and services offered to others is a dangerous precedent, and ripe for abuse. A local feed store was prosecuted for selling a raw material for meth, a material that also had other legal uses. The business was convicted for not verifying the material was being used for a legal purpose.

Does Home Depot or Lowes now have to verify any purchase will be used for a legal purpose? Or must every car dealer, or even a private seller, verify that a car being purchased will be used only for a legal purpose? I sell communications equipment that, so far as I know, is used for legal purposes, but what if some of that equipment is somehow diverted and used to support an illegal enterprise? Should I be responsible? Expecting businesses and individuals to be cops is a dangerous precedent. As with FedeX, I will cooperate with the cops, but I have no intention of taking on responsibilities that rightly belong to the cops.

As others have suggested, the word corruption comes to mind when considering some of the areas where government is now sticking their nose. And what else would we expect out of Chicago, either directly or indirectly?


36 posted on 08/16/2014 8:16:11 AM PDT by RLM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson