So the media has known about the robbery for days and said nothing before now
I’m not sure. If they did and withheld it at the request of police (maybe to stave off more rioting), I’d think about that, but if they withheld it to rush out a purposely misleading narrative, they make me sick. If they did know, I’d believe it would be the second scenario, to “shape” public opinion instead of reporting.
Since the Lawyer has already gone on TV and admitted his client was with Brown when Brown STOLE (not took) the cigars, what was his purpose to go on TV and say this? Have the police/prosecutors already granted him some type of immunity? Why would a lawyer for a witness/suspected perp admit the guilt on TV?
I knew about it. On the first night of looting, I posted the video of Dorian Johnson describing the robbery and shooting. It seems not many here watched it.