[jjsheridan5]

Have you listened to him???

No, I haven't. Is that what you are basing his credibility on? I have known many people who sound very credible, but are completely untrustworthy. So I tend to discount that. Anyway, I was just curious if there was some substantive reason to put a lot of stock in his account, given that he is hardly unbiased.

I just remember how the public narrative of the Trayvon Martin case turned out to be completely false, and would think people would have learned their lesson by now.

[Uncle Chip]

Actually the first narrative by Zimmerman stood the test of everything thrown at it and proved to be true. And just like him this kid provided details that the forensic evidence should be able to validate if true.

Who would think to make up a story of a cop in broad daylight with witnesses all around reaching out the door window and grabbing his friend with his left hand while pulling out his gun with his right hand and shooting him with it.

And then shooting him in the back and then a few more times when he turned around.

He’s told his story to the press and to investigators and it has been corroborated by other witnesses.

If there is another witness with another story then let him step forward — and I’m referring to the cop who is conveniently MIA.