>> It’s meaningless because all it is is a bunch of words.
>
> What should it be, a bunch of bear traps, machine guns and nuclear bombs?
It’s like someone saying, promising something with absolutely no intent to follow through.
It’s like a cloud that never gives rain hovering over a droughted land.
> If the activists, and the primary candidates don’t expose and hold these RINOs accountable, who’s fault is that?
That would be the people, wouldn’t it?
> By the way, the platforms are conservative... McCain and Romney et al are hardly shining examples of conservatives, nor are they even examples of “most elected Republicans” What do you think RINO means?
And here you are proving yourself wrong again: if things really worked like you say and they were held accountable they wouldn’t be “most elected” would they?
So, what does this mean? It means that such are NOT in fact RINOs, but instead embody the actuality of the Republican party.
No, that would be the activists and primary candidates.
The "Republican Party" (voters) wrote the platforms. Do you disagree with the platforms?