Ok, since you like Obama do not understand what is a criminal matter and what is an act of war, let me try one more time to explain:
1. When rockets are being shot from one country to another, the sending country has committed an act of war if just by allowing this. The receiving country has a right to defend itself, even if noncombatants in the sending country are killed. The receiving country should perhaps minimize injury and death of noncombatants, maybe. Injury and death to noncombatants led to a clear end of WWII so even that is not completely clear.
2. When someone robs a bank, it is a criminal justice matter. It is all happening in one country. The existence of said country is not threatened by the bank robbery like it is by the rocket attacks. The police should of course try to capture the criminals who robbed the bank, but they do have an absolute duty to minimize injury to non-criminals.
One of the biggest problems with the Obama administration is its tendency to treat acts of war as criminal justice matters. One of the biggest problems in American policing is the tendency to treat criminal justice matters as acts of war and the resulting militarization of US policing.
I never said it was an act of war. You are making presumptions and indicating something was said...that never was...and then answering that straw man. I will let other readers determine who is acting in a manner similar to liberals orbthenObsma administration.
You attempt to discredit my argument with such deflections however...well, it speaks for itself.
I said that blaming these officers for what happened to this poor woman was “like” blaming Israel. Not that the acts of these robbers were acts of war.
But what they most certainly were, were violent deadly acts that put the general public in danger and that the police responded to those acts...and one of the criminals, in the firefight that ensued covered himself with the poor woman.
He and the other criminals are responsible for her death.