Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: 1rudeboy
Just days after US intelligence officials admitted they had no conclusive evidence to prove Russia was behind the downing of the airliner, Kiev published satellite images as ‘proof’ it didn’t deploy anti-aircraft batteries around the MH17 crash site. However, these images have altered time-stamps and are from the days after the MH17 tragedy, the Russian Defense Ministry revealed, fully discrediting the Ukrainian claims.

In yet another yet-to-be explained event, Russian military detected a Ukrainian SU-25 fighter jet approaching the MH17 Boeing on the day of the catastrophe. No acceptable explanation has ever been given by Kiev as to why this fighter aircraft was so close to the doomed passenger jet moments before it was brought down.

Net they'll be saying TWA Flight 800 wasn't a center fuel tank explosion.

11 posted on 08/10/2014 11:38:58 AM PDT by McGruff ("We're Leaving Behind a Sovereign, Stable, and Self-Reliant Iraq" - Obama in 2011)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: McGruff

Do you have the link to the Alex Jones article?


12 posted on 08/10/2014 11:49:34 AM PDT by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: McGruff
US radar intercepts from the area show no evidence of a Ukrainian jet in the area.

Furthermore, take a moment to think about the hypothesis that a Ukrainian jet would fire upon a civilian airliner.

WHY? To sway public opinion against Russia? Public opinion was already against Russia. The Ukrainians know that the airspace is being monitored by US and NATO assets. They know that the radar intercept and tracking signals from a fighter jet are clearly different than from a BUK. They KNOW there is no way they would get away with a shoot-down.

So now you are left with the possibility of human-error/accident on the part of the (mythical) Ukrainian pilot. A highly trained pilot flying ground support/interdiction mission would not have any reason to approach, much less engage, an airliner. He's trained enough to differentiate between a great big fat-body passenger plane and a Russian jet. Furthermore, the airliner is squawking its status for all to hear and see and in no way resembles, visually or otherwise, any Russian spy birds. He, the (mythical) Ukrainian pilot, will have no reason to even “accidentally” paint the airliner.

Finally, if there had really been a Ukrainian jet in the area, the dumb-ass militia/separatists/terrorists/Russian pawns would have been arguing that they were aiming at IT and the airliner just got in the way. Instead we have intercepts of those same dumb-asses bragging about bringing down a Ukrainian spy bird.

They are dumb-asses. Barely trained conscripts misusing 1980’s technology = lots of dead people. Putin didn't order the shooting, but he put the gun in the hand of the perp and set him out to rob the liquor store.

26 posted on 08/10/2014 1:24:55 PM PDT by brothers4thID (Be professional, be courteous, and have a plan to kill everyone in the room.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: McGruff
In yet another yet-to-be explained event, Russian military detected a Ukrainian SU-25 fighter jet approaching the MH17 Boeing on the day of the catastrophe. No acceptable explanation has ever been given by Kiev as to why this fighter aircraft was so close to the doomed passenger jet moments before it was brought down.

There's no evidence that an SU-25 was close to MH17. And, in any case, an SU-25 is not capable of shooting down an airliner flying at 33,000 feet. It was designed to provide close air support to Soviet ground forces. Its service ceiling is 23,000 feet.

44 posted on 08/10/2014 2:00:00 PM PDT by cynwoody
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson