Which applied to the interval BEFORE the Cross.
Replacement theology has a crucial weakness, in that it fails to account for the obvious fact that the original Covenant was drawn up by one with total foreknowledge. Had said Covenant been meant to cover his future visitations to earth, and in different appearances/forms, it would have been so mentioned.
Not to worry, as that Covenant was meant for a specified group. Later ones were for others.
Just my opinion - after all, who am I to question, or parse words with, that particular author.