Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: MarMema

And it gets even more interesting...

On July 30th, the NIH decided not to renew Tulane’s 5 year contract for the Lassa Fever project in Sierra Leone.

http://www.reuters.com/article/2014/08/07/us-health-ebola-funding-exclusive-idUSKBN0G72C220140807

From the article:

NIH declined to comment on the decision, citing “federal government procurement integrity rules.”

What integrity issues were involved?


21 posted on 08/09/2014 5:39:13 PM PDT by independentmind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]


To: independentmind
In the letter to Tulane, a contracting officer for the NIH’s National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Liem Nguyen, said the proposal had been rejected “based on technical factors, scientific priority, and availability of funds." The proposal, the letter added, "falls short of those considered by NIAID to offer the best opportunities for the most successful accomplishment of the acquisition objectives."

They just lost the contract. Whoever wrote the proposal did a poor job or NIH was not impressed with what they had done with the last contract, or money is just tight and this was not a high enough priority.

28 posted on 08/09/2014 8:14:23 PM PDT by MarMema (Run Ted Run)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson