[mountainbunny]

I’m fine with this.

Don’t try to assassinate or kill someone, and you’ll never have to worry about it.

James Brady suffered greatly before he died. The shooter deserves to suffer now.

[Defiant]

I’m fine with the murder charge for a decades-old act, too, if you can tie the injury to the cause of death. What I’m confused about is how they expect to convict when he was already found not guilty by reason of insanity. Would that decision not stand, and would this not be retrying him for the same act, with merely a higher charge?