If voters have a healthy skepticism of both “TEA Party” and “Establishment” candidates, I see that as a good thing. It’ll force the voters to take a real hard look at their candidates and judge them on individual merits (or lack thereof) and not generic labels.
Agree 100 percent.
I agree. There have been plenty of candidates seeking to ride the coattails of the Tea Party who have been poseurs or duds.
Judge a candidate by his/her stands on the issues, not because they say they are aligned with this or that group. If they are elected, hold their feet to the fire or vote them out next time if they don't walk the walk.
See my post #19. Your lesson for the day.