“You are the one trying to make a horse a cow, and pretend that libertarians are not social liberals and weak on national defense.”
I’ve simply said that isn’t the definition of libertarianism, which is a true statement that nobody on this thread has yet offered any decent rebuttal of. Some libertarians certainly ascribe to those views, but not all of them.
You are trying to define a whole by a subset, which is a logical fallacy. If you were doing it merely out of ignorance, then you would correct your mistake when it was pointed out to you. As you have refused to do that, then I see no other alternative but to think you must be intentionally doing it to deceive people.
The last thing anyone needs to do in politics, is to get off into the tall grass of fantasy and distraction of the fringe elements like listening to communists and libertarians and socialists describe themselves in their own fantasy world of theory.
When Rand Paul goes libertarian on us, we know where he is going.