Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

How Pat Roberts and the GOP Lost Kansas
breitbart.com ^ | 8/6/14 | Dan Riehl

Posted on 08/07/2014 6:01:17 AM PDT by cotton1706

If you want to truly understand politics, especially of the Right-leaning variety, you'll have to look beyond the dumbed-down, self-congratulatory so called journalism of Beltway establishment publications like Politico.

Here is their headline out of Kansas: How Pat Roberts beat Milton Wolf. But the real story has to be read between the lines.

Pat Roberts’ narrower-than-expected win over challenger Milton Wolf on Tuesday night — came with a big lift from party headquarters in Washington.

The Republican Party threw everything they had behind Roberts .... and what did they get for it? Less than 50% of their own base vote, that's what. The anti-Roberts vote was split, not "defeated."

Roberts defeated Wolf, 48 percent to 41 percent; a pair of minor candidates combined for the remaining 11 percent of the vote.

The D.C. GOP consultant class can back-slap all they want. They may even dance themselves silly right out of their expensive loafers. Unfortunately, all the results from Kansas last night proved is that the Republican Party continues to be a party at odds with its base. Furthermore, if they continue to try and ignore that reality, anything and everything they think they are winning now will be wiped away with a disastrous defeat in 2016.

At this point, given the problems with their base voters, they may not even capture their coveted Senate majority in the Fall. Only able to capture 48% of their own vote, the Republican establishment did not emerge energized and victorious out of Kansas last night - what it did was throw just enough money at Kansas to enable an aging, out of touch politician to cling to power for just a few more years.

(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: elections; kansas
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-59 last
To: fieldmarshaldj
I don't know why....

I've been around here since before 2000....

Joined up in 2000....and never cared much about bragging about myself..........Which...it appears that's pretty much what goes on.

You want to know about me...Ask me.

41 posted on 08/07/2014 2:30:47 PM PDT by Osage Orange (I have strong feelings about gun control. If there's a gun around, I want to be controlling it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Osage Orange

Doesn’t require putting up one’s entire C.V. Just a few words, sentences, anything, really. But you’ve got your state flag up, and that alone is more than some of these folks have.


42 posted on 08/07/2014 2:38:56 PM PDT by fieldmarshaldj (Resist We Much)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: BillyBoy
I think it's like this, Billy.............

Many in the GOP party...are just sick and tired of the same old thing.

Roberts, Dole, McCain, Romney, Lindsey, Alexander, Cochran, Cornyn....We've seen it all before.

I'm tired...and worn. I'm sick of the same old thing.

I want my kids to see a better government...

Can you say Roberts did anything to achieve that?

Hey...I'm from OK...we thought Tom Coburn was going to be different...In reality he isn't/wasn't..........

I'm very tried...and very weary.

43 posted on 08/07/2014 2:39:20 PM PDT by Osage Orange (I have strong feelings about gun control. If there's a gun around, I want to be controlling it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: fieldmarshaldj
I don't give a rat's............

Nothing personal...

That's just me.............

44 posted on 08/07/2014 2:40:32 PM PDT by Osage Orange (I have strong feelings about gun control. If there's a gun around, I want to be controlling it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: fieldmarshaldj
There was no fraud in Nevada.

Nope Dingy Harry was by far the best candidate right?

When a thief is elected by a wide margin and the SEIU is counting the votes, I tend to be a little suspicious of the result.

45 posted on 08/08/2014 11:15:27 AM PDT by itsahoot (Voting for a Progressive RINO is the same as voting for any other Tyrant.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: itsahoot

You quoted my first sentence. You seemed to ignore the rest. Go back and read it.

Put up weak loser candidates and don’t act shocked when they, y’know, lose.

That Reid is execrable is a known fact. He got the opponent he wanted, and as a result, he didn’t have to “fix” anything in the general.

BTW, I was here during the 2010 election cycle exposing the disastrous Sharron Angle and that she would blow the race. What were you doing ?


46 posted on 08/08/2014 11:27:23 AM PDT by fieldmarshaldj (Resist We Much)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: fieldmarshaldj
We didn't have a candidate nearly as bad as Angle, but I knew it was a bad idea to take an obscure D.A. from a middle size county who had never run for statewide office and try to run him for Senate in his first rodeo. He caught foot in mouth disease and lost.

I count five seats that would be in Republican hands today but for incompetent candidates foisted on the party.

47 posted on 08/08/2014 11:35:29 AM PDT by colorado tanker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: colorado tanker

We have a lot of incompetent candidates.... McConnell, Cornyn, Graham, Cochran (incompetent plus incontinent)


48 posted on 08/08/2014 11:36:58 AM PDT by GeronL (Vote for Conservatives not for Republicans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: GeronL

I’m as fed up as anyone but this crap is really getting old. How could any sentient being think that a Senate under McConnell would be anywhere near as bad as the Senate under Reid has been?


49 posted on 08/08/2014 11:41:27 AM PDT by colorado tanker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: colorado tanker

Because McConnell hates conservatives with a white hot passion


50 posted on 08/08/2014 11:42:31 AM PDT by GeronL (Vote for Conservatives not for Republicans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: colorado tanker

I agree. Buck was way in over his head. Jane Norton wasn’t the greatest, but she’d have beaten the seatwarmer Dem Bennet. Hopefully the CO GOP smartens up and gets a decent opponent for him in 2016.

Alas, this seat would never have been lost in the first place in 2004 had Bob Schaffer instead of the incompetent Pete Coors been the nominee against Ken Salazar. Another Rovian choice foisted on us.


51 posted on 08/08/2014 11:43:56 AM PDT by fieldmarshaldj (Resist We Much)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: GeronL

It’s true. And the current leadership demonstrates precisely why they lost the majority in 2006 and have learned absolutely nothing from it. McConnell needs to be dumped as leader (as does everyone in leadership in both Houses).


52 posted on 08/08/2014 11:46:25 AM PDT by fieldmarshaldj (Resist We Much)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: GeronL
Well, that has a way of happening when you declare war and try to take a guy's job away from him.

Time we quit fighting each other and start fighting the people who are not only trying to destroy the Republic but are actually succeeding.

53 posted on 08/08/2014 11:46:30 AM PDT by colorado tanker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: fieldmarshaldj
Agree on both counts. The Pete Coors thing was a total disaster.

We have a fantastic candidate in Cory Gardner, a true conservative and very electable, but this is going to be a really expensive and really ugly race.

54 posted on 08/08/2014 11:48:30 AM PDT by colorado tanker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: colorado tanker

No, he was already like that. That is why he got a primary challenger.

You act like challenging his Lord and Majesty in the a primary is a declaration of war. He was the one who said he would use his office and his power in the party to stop TEA party candidates and move to punish PACs who fund those TEA Party candidates.

He is still doing it too.

When Cantor lost his primary, the local GOP decided to give away their GOTV money. The RINO left plays for keeps and you act like we should support them anyway. They have been doing stuff like this for YEARS and YEARS.

McConnell and the like are the enemy of conservatives. They have been for a long time.


55 posted on 08/08/2014 12:02:52 PM PDT by GeronL (Vote for Conservatives not for Republicans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: fieldmarshaldj

bump


56 posted on 08/08/2014 12:03:21 PM PDT by GeronL (Vote for Conservatives not for Republicans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: colorado tanker; GeronL

To elaborate on both of your comments a bit... it would be nice if we could come together, but there is a fundamental disconnect between the establishment leaders and the party (Conservative) base.

To McConnell and Co., their interests are solely about preserving their own power and position. Conservative ideology, saving the Republic isn’t on their agenda (or at best is far down their list of priorities), while the latter remains the base’s goals. It’s virtually impossible to reconcile two completely different agendas. One is self-serving, the other noble and necessary.

McConnell/Cochran/McCain/Graham, et al, I don’t even consider to be in the same party as Ted Cruz or Mike Lee. They’ve become the Democrat opposition in tactics and in character. You’re never going to change them.


57 posted on 08/08/2014 12:16:44 PM PDT by fieldmarshaldj (Resist We Much)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: fieldmarshaldj

McConnell’s wife sits on board of group working to kill coal industry

http://news.yahoo.com/mitch-mcconnell-s-wife-sits-on-the-board-of-a-group-working-to-kill-the-coal-industry-041726501.html

didn’t she just make an ad accusing Grimes of that??


58 posted on 08/08/2014 12:27:40 PM PDT by GeronL (Vote for Conservatives not for Republicans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: fieldmarshaldj
McConnell/Cochran/McCain/Graham, et al, I don’t even consider to be in the same party as Ted Cruz or Mike Lee

I think you are correct. It is hard to consider them to be the same party.

59 posted on 08/08/2014 12:28:21 PM PDT by GeronL (Vote for Conservatives not for Republicans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-59 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson