Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: sickoflibs
You missed the part where it said the mall is private property. 'private'

True. Of course, the other thing that is private is where people to choose to exercise their spending decisions.

19 posted on 08/06/2014 5:45:22 AM PDT by Yashcheritsiy (It's time to Repeal and Replace the Republican Party)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]


To: Yashcheritsiy

It is private property, but it is also a place of public accommodation, and the general public is invited, even encouraged, to enter. It is a close legal call, at first blush (I have not done any research on the issue.) Certainly the ladies could not be excluded because they are Christians (or belong to any other religious sect). Behavior, however, could be restricted. First Amendment rights restrict government interference, but not private property owners. Clearly they could not set up an altar and have a church service in the mall, at least not without permission. This is a much smaller act, but probably still something the owner could prohibit— LEGALLY.

How the customer base might react is another question.


22 posted on 08/06/2014 6:08:20 AM PDT by NCLaw441
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: Yashcheritsiy

Bingo!

You are the winner!


37 posted on 08/06/2014 7:32:12 AM PDT by sickoflibs (King Obama : 'The debate is over. The time for talk is over. Just follow my commands you serfs""')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson