To: markomalley
I don't know that a coup d'etat is something that the (twice!) elected president of a country can be accused of. But it
is that serious. Surely a better word can be found. Hubris. Tyranny. I'm open to suggestions.
Impeach now. All the arguments against this ignore that a would-be tyrant on the defensive is not as 'flexible'.
To: OldNewYork
If we impeach now, then the conversation is about whack-job racist republicans. And we lose the Senate. Again.
The best course is to have the insurance premiums come out, have companies lay off employees and let a couple of measles cases pop up.
The ONLY way the Dems win in November is if we impeach.
Impeach in January.
59 posted on
08/04/2014 6:00:34 AM PDT by
Vermont Lt
(If you want to keep your dignity, you can keep it. Period........ Just kidding, you can't keep it.)
To: OldNewYork
Actually I like using the word Coup. Obama is accusing Republicans of planning to Impeach him (I wish), to gin up votes/campaign cash, stirring up fears among the idiots.
We need to fight back with the same hyperbole, and scare the idiots into voting Republican with the word: Coup.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson