Skip to comments.
America, Ebola, and Fear: Overblown Panic in America
National Review ^
| 08/02/2014
| Dr. MARC SIEGEL
Posted on 08/02/2014 7:18:35 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-117 next last
To: SeekAndFind
Translation
You should be happy Ebola is being brought to the US so people like me can feel good about themselves.
Sorry doc but I feel a whole lot better about myself for wanting to keep it over there.
21
posted on
08/02/2014 7:36:33 AM PDT
by
IMR 4350
To: CorporateStepsister
I trust that America’s soul has not been gutted...during the last five years...
22
posted on
08/02/2014 7:37:12 AM PDT
by
MeshugeMikey
( "Never, never, never give up". Winston Churchill ...)
To: Michael.SF.
From the article:
Ritual burial practices that involve touching and washing the sick are part of what is spreading Ebola in West Africa.
That, and getting into taxis with infected, relatively asymptomatic people.
Newspaper headlines report that Americans fear a pandemic even though Ebola doesnt spread through the air and all previous outbreaks have been stamped out.
And this one hasn't been stamped out. Maybe viruses are not as easy to predict as the doctor makes out. Maybe viruses change over time.
In the U.S., careful isolation of sick patients should prevent its spread if any cases do appear.
And that works for the first .001% of the population. Our medical system, while the best in the world, would crumble quickly in the face of any kind of pandemic requiring "careful isolation".
America, the land of the free, the home of the brave, is in a social-media panic because Dr. Kent Brantly, the 33-year-old Indiana physician who contracted Ebola while battling it in Liberia, is coming home as he struggles to hang onto life.
While his use of emotional catch-phrases is impressive, it doesn't address the underlying question: why is he being brought home? If the virus is going to kill him, it will do so relatively quickly, and by the time he gets home, he will either be dead or beyond care. It is much simpler to move the equipment and personnel to him, as opposed to moving him to them.
Personally, I am not concerned about him coming home. If the virus is so contagious that he poses a real risk (especially given the spotlight that they are under now), then there is no chance whatsoever that this will be contained to Africa, so it really won't make a difference. But that doesn't answer the question: why take the risk? Any kind of accident will immediately put American citizens in mortal danger, and it doesn't do any good to anyone, including Brantly.
Brantly himself makes me proud to be both an American and a physician, and reminds me of the fearless battle against HIV/AIDS in the 1980s, when we took personal risks to care for the sick and the dying.
Comparison between HIV/AIDS and Ebola is simply silly. HIV/AIDS is very difficult to get, especially for attending physicians. By contrast, treating Ebola patients involves very real risks, and deaths are not at all uncommon. This writer is simply feeding his own ego if he thinks the two are comparable.
In summary: the writer destroys his own credibility, puffs up his own ego, and does so to dismiss legitimate concerns.
23
posted on
08/02/2014 7:37:43 AM PDT
by
jjsheridan5
(Remember Mississippi -- leave the GOP plantation)
To: MeshugeMikey
True. But, Nobama just invited 10 heads of state from Africa into the US for a conference. Any one of those diplomats could be a walking petri dish.
To: SeekAndFind
I’m curious to learn in coming months whether support for Samaritan’s Purse increases or decreases.
To: k4gypsyrose
True. But, Nobama just invited 10 heads of state from Africa into the US for a conference. Any one of those diplomats could be a walking petri dish.
Whether normal protocol or not, this is another unwise decision.
To: SeekAndFind
While Ebola is supposedly spread only by contact with bodily fluids, these organisms do evolve new strains and could become airborne. Imagine trying to contain an outbreak of Ebola in the hoards illegally crossing our border. Despite the wish to evacuate these brave doctors and nurses to the US, I do not think it is worth the risk.
To: Resettozero
Given their irresponsible handling of repatriation of their people, definitely decreased from my household.
It’s a looooong flight home from Africa. You may feel perfectly well at the beginning. And be symptomatic at the end. Do you tell your fellow 3-400 passengers that you’re sick with a tummy bug or do you cop to having treated ebola patients last week?
To: MeshugeMikey
No it hasn’t. Americans are no longer rolling over and surely you’ve noticed the insane backlash against Obama? Americans protesting, pushing back, even our judges are pushing against Obama’s dictates and the Congress actually did something useful just now for once instead of just rolling over passive.
29
posted on
08/02/2014 7:47:14 AM PDT
by
CorporateStepsister
(I am NOT going to force a man to make my dreams come true)
To: SeekAndFind
As I understand it these doctors were following all the safety protocols and STILL caught it.
30
posted on
08/02/2014 7:49:03 AM PDT
by
DManA
To: SeekAndFind
NOTHING TO SEE HERE...MOVE ALONG...
31
posted on
08/02/2014 7:49:54 AM PDT
by
Caipirabob
(Communists... Socialists... Democrats...Traitors... Who can tell the difference?)
To: k4gypsyrose
I hate to say it but I think that we may need to do an INTERVENTION....at the Whitehouse.
Barrys insane pride in being pseudo compassionate could well backfire in ways no one could imagine.
32
posted on
08/02/2014 7:50:58 AM PDT
by
MeshugeMikey
( "Never, never, never give up". Winston Churchill ...)
To: CorporateStepsister
we do appear to have survived fairly well...all things considered.
with the general election just weeks away.....the ship of state could be turned around
33
posted on
08/02/2014 7:52:52 AM PDT
by
MeshugeMikey
( "Never, never, never give up". Winston Churchill ...)
To: SeekAndFind
The sheer numbers of medical professionals who have been infected have those on the front line questioning the communicability of this strain.
There are only 4 facilities in the US that have these kinds of isolation units, yet we’re told that an outbreak in the US isn’t possible because we have such great medical facilities.
These two are being flown over in an essential bubble and will be kept in a virtual vaccume.
How does that compare to someone walking into the ER not knowing what they even have? How many people has he already infected and will further infect in that hospital before they even realize what they’re dealing with?
There is a huge disconnect going on here.
34
posted on
08/02/2014 7:55:54 AM PDT
by
Raebie
To: MeshugeMikey
“if there were an ebola OUTBREAK in the US....the panic alone would do untold damage to scoiety”
Obama Inc will manipulate the panic in order to gain more control. Even if there is no leak of infection, or outbreak, all one of Obama’s lackeys has to do is ‘imply’ that the Ebola virus is spreading in the US,,,and the propaganda media will eat it up, even if NOT true and we will never know the truth.
If Obama can use Ebola (in any way, real or by threat) to try to affect the mid-terms, he’ll do it.
To: austinaero
NOTHING is beneath Obama!
36
posted on
08/02/2014 7:57:44 AM PDT
by
MeshugeMikey
( "Never, never, never give up". Winston Churchill ...)
To: MeshugeMikey
“The Internet is afire with protest, and the misleading headlines stating that Ebola is being brought to the U.S. spread more fear but no understanding or empathy.”
I’m sure Dr Brantley at one point thought he could safely care for those with Ebola,,then he contracted it.
Dr Seigel needs to be pinned down with the question “How did an expert on Ebola who surely practiced every precaution possible, actually end up with Ebola?”
Would love to hear the answer to that
To: jjsheridan5
Ebola: 5 Questions for a Frontline Healthcare Worker in Sierra Leone
“The repeated infection of expert healthcare workers in Sierra Leone and Liberia (who were presumably very careful about PPE), however, has raised some questions about whether this is a uniquely/especially contagious strain of the virus. We’re going to be communicating with Doctors Without Borders (MSF) to find out if they think this is an issue of systems (ie how people are geared-up or decontaminated) or something else (ie the type of PPE).”
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/andrew-maccalla/ebola-5-questions-for-a-f_1_b_5642610.html?utm_hp_ref=impact&ir=Impact
38
posted on
08/02/2014 8:02:17 AM PDT
by
Raebie
To: The Great RJ
Canadian researchers showed in 2012 that it could transmit from pigs to monkeys thru NO direct contact, ie. Airborne. The only debate was over the size of the droplets (smaller = greater distances travelled) and therefore whether it could truly be classified as airborne. Point being they've already shown it CAN travel without direct contact.
and they're bringing it here why?!?
39
posted on
08/02/2014 8:06:36 AM PDT
by
Axeslinger
(Where has my country gone?)
To: The Great RJ
Canadian researchers showed in 2012 that it could transmit from pigs to monkeys thru NO direct contact, ie. Airborne. The only debate was over the size of the droplets (smaller = greater distances travelled) and therefore whether it could truly be classified as airborne. Point being they've already shown it CAN travel without direct contact.
and they're bringing it here why?!?
40
posted on
08/02/2014 8:06:44 AM PDT
by
Axeslinger
(Where has my country gone?)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-117 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson