We'll have marriage between siblings and polygamy when a sufficient number of judges decide to grant it. Meanwhile, they can just as easy exclude family members and polygamy, as they now include homosexuals.
Didn’t Rick Santorum take a bunch of flak years ago for suggesting this very thing would happen?
Homosexual “marriage” does not redefine marriage, it undefines it.
If we adhered to constitutional boundaries, not man-made boundaries, the federal gov’t would not be involved in marriage at all.
Couples or groups could be married in their church and then file legal paperwork creating the legal arrangement they seek.
And polygamous women servicing all their marriages quickly devolving to chaos.
But that too is what barry wants for American society.
The Court just has not found the right case yet.
To use a Supreme Court phrase, if you accept the four cases above as precedent, there is no "rational basis" to forbid polygamy.
DFU SONG: Never My Love (never my goat)
DFU SONG PARODIES | 2-204 | Lyrics, Doug from Upland
Posted on 02/25/2004 8:52:25 AM PST by doug from upland
http://members.tripod.com/~midistation
MIDI - NEVER MY LOVE (scroll down to Oldies section)
You ask me if a liberal judge will stop me loving you
Never my goat...never my goat
You ask me if I’ll have to hide the things that I do to you
Never my goat...never my goat
When I watch you munching grass, I see your little ______ (fill in the blank)
And I lose...control...control
You ask me if the San Fran mayor will tell us we can’t be wed
Never my goat...never my goat
You ask me if John Kerry will keep you out of my bed
Never my goat...never my goat
When I watch you munching grass, I see your little ______ (fill in the blank)
And I lose...control...control, control
Never my goat...never my goat
Never my goat...never my goat
Never my goat...never my goat
*ping*
Polygamy will be made legal when three gay men or women sue for the right to marry each other.
Then the 14th Amendment will kickin and then poly will be legal for heterosexuals, too.
The majority in Lawrence v. Texas also said their decision wouldn’t lead to homosexual marriage; yet the pro-homosexul marriage groups use that case in arguments to promote homosexual marriage.