Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Salvavida

I give you one out of three on your response. Yes, Lincoln did, without congressional approval suspend the writ of Habeas Corpus. “Scores of confederate soldiers starved to death in Yankee prisons”. Can you say Andersonville. Neither the United States nor the Confederacy can claim the least bit of moral high ground when it comes to the way prisoners of war were treated, both sides were equally brutal. You mean the Buchanan administration failed to redress Southern grievances. Lincoln did not become President of the United States until March 4 1861. By that date, Georgia, S.Carolina, Florida, Alabama, Mississippi, Louisiana, and Texas had all seceded from the Union. What court actions had these states initiated to redress their grievances? What legislation did their Senators and Representatives introduce into Congress to redress their grievances? For that fact what grievances were so dire that secession was the only answer, not the courts nor the Legislature could redress. IMO, the Democrats in the South panicked when Lincoln was elected. A Republican President, House and Senate were seen as a direct threat to the institution of slavery as it existed in the South.


22 posted on 07/28/2014 4:03:32 AM PDT by X Fretensis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]


To: X Fretensis

You really think slavery was the reason. Hahahahahaha. Public school. Nice.


23 posted on 07/28/2014 9:20:57 AM PDT by Salvavida (The restoration of the U.S.A. starts with filling the pews at every Bible-believing church.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson