Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Perdogg; Lurking Libertarian; JDW11235; Clairity; Spacetrucker; Art in Idaho; GregNH; Salvation; ...

FReepmail me to subscribe to or unsubscribe from the SCOTUS ping list.

21 posted on 07/25/2014 11:03:30 AM PDT by BuckeyeTexan (There are those that break and bend. I'm the other kind. ~Steve Earle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: BuckeyeTexan
based on constitutional considerations: the long-standing principle that the court, if possible, should avoid overturning the work of a co-equal branch of government

Exactly how is that a constitutional consideration, especially one that overrides the text and intent of the Constitution itself, pray tell?

The Washington Post and the Left need a refresher remedial course in basic Constitutional structure of the checks (as in "checking the other branches' overreach", etc.) and balances of governmental power. I'm not sure what Roberts needs.

Sounds like they're at least addressing the separation of powers issue here from an administration that seems to have completely abandoned the notion. (I know Obama personally despises the constitutional dissipation of government power and he's taking his administration down that road as quickly as he can. There's no "lame duck" as far as Obama is concerned.)

24 posted on 07/25/2014 11:44:12 AM PDT by PapaNew (Freedom always wins the debate in the forum of ideas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson