To: left that other site
Even if such marriages are legal, there are people who dont agree. Should they be forced to provide services to something they dont agree with?
The other side would tell you that if you don’t force them, you end up with Jim Crow.
27 posted on
07/23/2014 9:57:56 AM PDT by
cuban leaf
(The US will not survive the obama presidency. The world may not either.)
To: cuban leaf
No one is refusing service to anyone based upon their race.
It is the event that goes against the person’s conscience (whatever the event might be), and that is where the right to refuse to provide a particular service should be protected by the Constitution.
In the case of the Colorado Baker, the homosexuals were already customers. He had never refused them service before. It was the EVENT that was the problem, not the customer.
36 posted on
07/23/2014 10:05:27 AM PDT by
left that other site
(You shall know the Truth, and The Truth Shall Set You Free.)
To: cuban leaf
The other side would tell you that if you dont force them, you end up with Jim Crow.
No doubt they would, because the other side has plenty of idiots. Jim Crow was discrimination based on race perpetrated BY THE GOVERNMENT. There were laws in place FORCING discrimination. In this case, it would be the individual choice of the business owner regarding whom they wished to serve. Big distinction, but the Left was never good with logical thought.
74 posted on
07/23/2014 11:57:44 AM PDT by
fr_freak
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson