[Resettozero]

Nice dodge. And no one name called, though your defense of the indefensible makes it tempting...

Don't know what you think I dodged, but don't really care. Based on your post above, there's not much sense in posting to each other, is there?

The original topic of this thread is Akin's book tour and appearances on TV, not the election. My comments were founded on the observation that DoodleDawg has posted on several FR threads of his disdain of Akin AS A PERSON long after he's lost the election and moved on. One of DoodleDawg's postings on this thread could be viewed as potentially threatening to Akin's person.

How you insinuated yourself into the subject matter...well, a future historian can re-read this thread if he wants to and make a determination. I choose not to.

Please...no more. Be satisfied. You win. I may very well be wrong about whatever it is you think I'm wrong about. Big honking deal.

-30-

[DoodleDawg]

The original topic of this thread is Akin's book tour and appearances on TV, not the election. My comments were founded on the observation that DoodleDawg has posted on several FR threads of his disdain of Akin AS A PERSON long after he's lost the election and moved on.

Wrong gender.

One of DoodleDawg's postings on this thread could be viewed as potentially threatening to Akin's person.

Which one?

[Lakeshark]

It won't take "a future historian" to see that it was you who addressed me first, or that you came on the thread as one of the few defending the idiot Akin.

It seems you are mostly pissed off at yourself for not realizing what an ego driven loser he was and apparently still is.

You've proceeded to take on multiple posters here for some reason over this loser, and from what I can see it won't take future historians to see you were schooled in each conversation.