Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Poll: Most Say Opposition to Obama Has Pretty Much Nothing to Do With Race
Townhall.com ^ | July 15, 2014 | Daniel Doherty

Posted on 07/15/2014 12:58:38 PM PDT by Kaslin

Yesterday, Katie wrote up Attorney General Eric Holder’s comments on ABC’s This Week, in which he suggested there was a “racial component” underlying the tea party movement. He was quick to temper his remarks, however, by adding that only “some people” in America are actuated by racism. Nevertheless, his position was clear: the United States is a racist country, and therefore President Obama has been "treated differently" (as has he) than any of his predecessors.

Not surprisingly, most Americans categorically reject this “theory.” For example, according to a recent Rasmussen Reports poll, 61 percent of respondents said opposition to the president is “primarily” rooted in … his policies:

A new Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey finds that 61% of Likely U.S. Voters think people who oppose the president’s policies do so primarily because they believe his policies are bad, not because of racism.

There can be no doubt there is a (relatively small) segment of the population, motivated by hatred and racial animus, who abhor the president because of his skin color. I will agree with Holder on that much. And thus, despite the nation’s progress on race relations over the last half-century, they are still blinded by their own bigotry and close-mindedness. This is regrettable and wrong. But it’s also worth noting that the vast, vast majority of Republicans, if they do disagree with the president on any number of issues, do so primarily on the merits.

This, of course, is something administration officials with an agenda keenly understand, but will never admit publicly.


TOPICS: Culture/Society
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-44 last
To: dead

I didn’t vote against that arrogant pos because of his skin color, I voted against him because he is a rat!!!


41 posted on 07/15/2014 4:30:12 PM PDT by Kaslin (He needed the ignorant to reelect him, and he got them. Now we all have to pay the consequenses)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Beagle8U

He is actually not anti-gun, he just does not like guns in the city that is heavily populated. He doesn’t mind them out in the county


42 posted on 07/15/2014 4:38:23 PM PDT by Kaslin (He needed the ignorant to reelect him, and he got them. Now we all have to pay the consequenses)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

If it is in the eye of the Be-Holder then it is racist!


43 posted on 07/16/2014 4:10:56 AM PDT by shalom aleichem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

“He is actually not anti-gun, he just does not like guns in the city that is heavily populated.”

That is anti-gun, the 2nd amendment covers everyone, not just those in rural areas. He thinks it only covers hunting.


44 posted on 07/16/2014 6:57:30 AM PDT by Beagle8U (Unions are an Affirmative Action program for Slackers! .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-44 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson