WKB please ping the MS list, thank you.
This article is profoundly biased as you would expect from the New York Times, but it does present some information that I haven’t see in the debate and is useful from that perspective. The author is careful to present facts and even more careful to omit critical information in order to present a very distorted view of this affair. The distortions are all in favor of the Cochran version of events. It’s a rare day when the New York Times helps any Republican and brings into question why the Left has become such a champion of Thad Cochran.
Maybe they knew all along that he was one of them. Those thoughts were certainly reinforced by the Democrat-like tactics and behavior that we saw from the Cochran campaign and his Haley Barbour minders.