Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Bratch

One cannot be socially liberal on the policy side whilst being fiscally conservative. These are diametrically opposed philosophies.

In order to be socially liberal the policy maker has to extract largesse from the public coffer to promote said socially liberal programs.

How about socially neutral and fiscally conservative?

It seems to me that millenials are just confused immature individuals (heads full of mush).


17 posted on 07/14/2014 6:57:37 AM PDT by jurroppi1 (The only thing you "pass to see what's in it" is a stool sample. h/t MrB)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: jurroppi1

“One cannot be socially liberal on the policy side whilst being fiscally conservative. These are diametrically opposed philosophies.”

Bingo!

Open borders = Millions of unskilled morons that don’t speak English with 8 kids drawing welfare.

The Libtardians will say...Oh, but we want to end welfare. Like that would ever happen.


21 posted on 07/14/2014 7:09:42 AM PDT by Beagle8U (Unions are an Affirmative Action program for Slackers! .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

To: jurroppi1
One cannot be socially liberal on the policy side whilst being fiscally conservative. These are diametrically opposed philosophies.

In order to be socially liberal the policy maker has to extract largesse from the public coffer to promote said socially liberal programs.

How does, for example, "stop arresting people for selling, buying, or using marijuana" require extracting largesse from the public coffer?

22 posted on 07/14/2014 7:19:37 AM PDT by ConservingFreedom (A goverrnment strong enough to impose your standards is strong enough to ban them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson