Why they don't have to cover this story?
Usually the MSM finds ONE difference - than say ‘see, it's not the same’. Of course it IS the same and the MSM is biased as hell - but it's fun watching for ‘the excuse’..
We're NOT covering this story like we did with Bush and Katrina BECAUSE:
“ Katrina Involved Water” and we would cover the border story IF water was involved.
Or “ Katrina involved a Natural Disaster and this is man made”
Or “It's hard to interview the illegals, but it was easy to get into New Orleans” during the hurricane...
Anyhow, I think I've missed the New York Times’ lame-o excuse... anyone seen it yet? Oh, and the suck-ups at NBC probably have one too..
Yep, the enemedia have many excuses as to why they haven’t covered the truth for the last 5 1/2 years.
I’d have a stroke if they told the truth once and just said “because it’s 0bama.”
Just for you. The MSM explains why the border crisis is not like Katrina:
‘Talking to political director John Dickerson on Thursday’s CBS This Morning, co-host Norah O’Donnell tried to dismiss Texas Governor Rick Perry calling the current border crisis President Obama’s “Katrina moment”: “Is there some truth to that or is there, as we say in Texas, is that a bunch of bull?”
Dickerson flippantly replied: “Well, you know, the Katrina moment since that disaster has gotten kind of thrown around, it’s become something of a political cliche. I think this might be the President’s maybe twentieth Katrina moment.”’
Read more: http://newsbusters.org/#ixzz376wP50eW