Skip to comments.
PAT ROBERTS ON TEA PARTY'S CHALLENGE OF HIM: 'I MIGHT BE NEXT'
Breitbart ^
| 7/9/2014
| Matthew Boyle
Posted on 07/09/2014 1:42:35 PM PDT by bkopto
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-51 next last
To: Kansas58
21
posted on
07/09/2014 2:17:17 PM PDT
by
Viennacon
(Rebuke the Repuke!)
Comment #22 Removed by Moderator
To: SoConPubbie
I am a solid conservative.
I think birthers are often kooks, and I think those who oppose abortion restrictions based on “purity” arguments are also silly.
I have helped defeat more incumbent Republicans than anyone you know.
You just don't like it when I tell flakey loose cannons that they are on the wrong path.
23
posted on
07/09/2014 2:19:03 PM PDT
by
Kansas58
Comment #24 Removed by Moderator
To: bkopto
“Sen. Pat Roberts (R-KS) told Sen. Bob Corker (R-TN) that he may be the next victim of the anti-incumbent Tea Party mood sweeping America”
I believe the “Tea Party” to be nothing more than the republican party’s Conservative base. If the republican acknowledge this the republicans would need to stop using the term Conservative, to them it’s just an obligatory campaign slogan.
25
posted on
07/09/2014 2:21:27 PM PDT
by
duffee
(NO poll tax, NO tax on firearms, ammunition or gun safes. NO gun free zones.)
Comment #26 Removed by Moderator
To: F15Eagle
That is not YOUR call.
The US Senate says Roberts is a Kansas Resident.
The Kansas Department of Revenue says Roberts is a Kansas Resident.
The Governor, the Kansas AG, the Kansas Secretary of State all say Roberts is a Kansas Resident.
Nearly every member of Congress, Senate and House, maintain a home in the DC area.
This is silly.
27
posted on
07/09/2014 2:23:11 PM PDT
by
Kansas58
Comment #28 Removed by Moderator
Comment #29 Removed by Moderator
Comment #30 Removed by Moderator
To: F15Eagle
Politicians and diapers need to be changed often, and for the same reason.
31
posted on
07/09/2014 2:27:20 PM PDT
by
MrB
(The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
To: Kansas58
I think birthers are often kooks, and I think those who oppose abortion restrictions based on purity arguments are also silly.
I have helped defeat more incumbent Republicans than anyone you know.
You just don't like it when I tell flakey loose cannons that they are on the wrong path.
Naww, you're more of a moderate than a conservative, and your past posting history, and this post in particular proves it.
Anyone using the perjorative term "purity" arguments when it comes to conservatives, ain't a conservative.
You seem to be a legend in your own mind though.
32
posted on
07/09/2014 2:27:28 PM PDT
by
SoConPubbie
(Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency)
To: F15Eagle
Wolf won’t get 30% of the vote.
Wolf is a JOKE in Kansas. He has virtually no support.
33
posted on
07/09/2014 2:27:44 PM PDT
by
Kansas58
Comment #34 Removed by Moderator
Comment #35 Removed by Moderator
Comment #36 Removed by Moderator
To: SoConPubbie
I helped pass a late term abortion restriction in Kansas which required George Tiller to get a 2nd Opinion before he could do a late term abortion.
Tiller violated that law, and it got him charged in criminal court. (unfortunately Tiller won, but he shouldn't have).
The silly “no compromise” crowd fought that legislation before it was signed into law.
I know Kansas.
I know Pat Roberts.
Roberts should win and Roberts will win, easily.
Don't waste time and money on the gadfly phony Milton Wolf!
37
posted on
07/09/2014 2:30:30 PM PDT
by
Kansas58
To: F15Eagle
I am rather confident that Roberts spends more time in Kansas than either of your two Senators.
I see Pat Roberts IN KANSAS on a fairly regular basis.
38
posted on
07/09/2014 2:33:17 PM PDT
by
Kansas58
Comment #39 Removed by Moderator
To: Kansas58
You are wrong. You have no idea what you are talking about. Dude. I do know what I'm talking about. I'm a radiologist. You don't have a clue about this subject.
40
posted on
07/09/2014 2:37:17 PM PDT
by
bkopto
(Free men are not equal. Equal men are not free.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-51 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson