Replies

Ping to Sarah's Awesome List!
I don't understand why everyone is so upset over this border thing.
It's just Government Sponsored Mass Human relocation.
All Communists do it.
It's to change the political make up of a certain section of the country.
Who do you think this Illegals will support?
Good Patriotic Americans like JimRob and Syncro (Check this out! FReepers interview by Greta) or the people who gave them Lollypops.

It's Almost like this is treason or something.....

His words and actions, like Hitler's, told everybody what his intentions were. But like those in Hitler's day, nobody believed it.

He PROMISED to "Yes-We-Can" fundamentally change America. His VOTING RECORD as a senator told everybody he was to the LEFT of the Socialist Party, so it was easy to see that his fundamental "change" was going to be an attempt to take America from a Constitutional Republic to a Marxist state.

Government take-over of as many things as possible was the goal of the first half of this "presidency" with his crowning achievement being government take-over of healthcare. Nobody blinked. He was reelected.

Somewhere along the line in his "lame duck" second half, he decided he had nothing to lose by doing whatever he could to unconstitutionally consolidate power to himself and destabilize the United States in as many ways as possible.

Reasons to impeach are too long to mention (the list of grievances could read like the Declaration of Independence) but for me, the last straw was letting the five Taliban crazies go back where they could effectively wage murderous Islam jihad on America.

Impeach Obama, repeal Obamacare, cut government by 80%+, constantly assert alternative of the wealth-creating free market economy, and let freedom once again rain in America.

.....”It's just Government Sponsored Mass Human relocation”....

Very likely as part of the Globalist Agenda is to bring 3rd world populations into the folds of more prosperous nations. Starting wars also corrals people (”refuges”) ...Ukraine is an excellent example...thus control the population that remains without interference.

If enough South Americans come here the population will be easier to control as opposition to them being here escalates.

I’ve been thinking about this “word salad” to quote a PDS’r for the last couple of days. I’ve made no secret of my opposition to impeachment as a strategery because of my belief that it has almost zero chance of succeeding. However, SP has come out for it forcefully and that of course is going to get me to start to rethink it, and more importantly, try to glean the subtler intent.

I think the biggest clue here other than the stress on the bipartisan nature of what’s happening, is the first sentence reference to an abusive marriage. If you read that sentence a couple of times, you come to realize that it’s not the language of removal from office, or firing, or prosecution. It’s the language of divorce. But divorce from what?

It’s been no secret that SP has been deeply critical of uniparty cronyism. Now, if you’re a very astute political player, and you realize that you have to organize a national political movement from an entrenched one party system, you’re going to have to peel off the support from that one party to accomplish that. You need a wedge. And we might have just seen that wedge driven home.

The uniparty desperately wants cheap labor and amnesty and by forcing the impeachment issue on the gop wing of the uniparty, you do two things: you separate the lambs from the goats, and in effect you deliver a poison pill. The gop wing of the uniparty loses any which way it goes on this. If they support impeachment you win that battle but fire up the opposition as a result. If they go against it they lose their base. If they do nothing, they appear to be conniving cowards. For someone who is looking to start a competing movement or party, it’s a win/win/win.

The timing provides another clue. Why start the calls for impeachment now? Why not wait until after the midterms? There is the argument that you hit the iron when it’s hot. But also if your ultimate objective is to replace the gop faction or peel off its supporters, then the timing is close to perfect. The argument against 2nd parties has always been that they can’t win. Well what good is a gop faction that can’t win anyway?

In sum, I’m thinking that the subtler intent here may be to give birth to a second political party.