[kingu]

Ahh, I can just see how this plays out.. A child sues because his ‘sexual rights’ trump state age of consent laws, that his ability to reproduce gives him the right to reproduce, and the state is infringing on his choices as to mate, a mate which can be either gender. And then the lawyers for the predator who wants his child flesh pulls out volume after volume of federal court rulings overturning existing marriage law and re-writing it to include homosexuals calling themselves married.

And I have no idea how you put this genie back in the bottle. How many cases until they get the ruling they want? 20? 40? The forces of the liberals are vast and highly organized. Eventually they will find one judge who wants his child flesh. or worse, an honest judge who will look at those vast volumes of precedent and make the ‘logical’ decision in the light of Lawrence, abortions, condoms and the rest that age of consent laws unconstitutionally infringe on a child's right to choose a sexual partner.

[ReformationFan]

That’s how it will turn out. Did you hear about this case in Italy last year?

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3103193/posts

I like E.T. Williams reaction to this story.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xo-ZS2WJGqU