Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ansel12

Yes, but the law has changed since then. Faubus was “preserving the peace.” In this case, it appears that the governor can act “in response to natural or man-made disasters or Homeland Defense missions.” This is clearly a Homeland Defense mission. I don’t think this has ever been tested. It almost looks like the case can be made that they are under command and control of the governor in that circumstance.


8 posted on 07/03/2014 8:07:58 PM PDT by doug from upland (Obama and the leftists - destroying our country one day at a time)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: doug from upland
They are under the command of the governor unless and until the president signs the order that federalizes them and places them under his control. The governor at that point has no recourse, and the guard units must obey the president.
9 posted on 07/03/2014 8:11:05 PM PDT by Publius ("Who is John Galt?" by Billthedrill and Publius now available at Amazon.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: doug from upland

I guess a Governor can tell the Guard what to do, until their Commander in Chief tells them differently.


10 posted on 07/03/2014 8:12:51 PM PDT by ansel12 (( Rand Paul---What a tragedy if America wouldn't have gotten to see Barack Obama as a leader.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson