Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Billthedrill

In the military, concealment is not an issue. Weight is more of an issue and that is better solved with holster and suspension designed into the uniform IMHO. This would have kept the 1911 around longer.

They dealt with the weight of the weapon rather than the perceived weight as handled by modern suspension and holster systems which can be engineered without the conceal carry issues needed in the civilian world.


138 posted on 07/03/2014 10:21:00 AM PDT by KC Burke (Gowdy for Supreme Court)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies ]


To: KC Burke
Absolutely. For sentry duty we had wide web belts that distributed the weight very well (I was in the Navy). It simply wasn't that big an issue.

I'm not sure training is really that big an issue, either. I recall my first Chief saying, "Mr. Drill, you give a sailor a cast-iron cannonball and in 24 hours he'll either lose it or [mess] it up!" but in practice it really wasn't all that bad. Lose a single cartridge over the side, though, and the consensus was that you might be better off jumping in after it.

146 posted on 07/03/2014 10:37:33 AM PDT by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 138 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson