Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: GIdget2004

It is up to the lawyers to educate the judiciary on the definition of marriage and its value to society (it is the institution that unites parents with their offspring, provides a mom and a dad to a child, and holds the father responsible for the offspring that he created).

As long as the liberal lawyers succeed in characterizing marriage as a mere contract between two people with associated government benefits and no relationship to procreation, then that’s the end of the societal good that marriage has always provided. One need only look at Black urban populations where single motherhood has taken the place of marriage to see where the country is headed when marriage is disconnected from procreation.

Once the link between marriage and procreation is understood, then the idea that animus has been the only reason for denying marriage to homosexuals is a silly argument. Unless you believe that there is anti-homosexual animus inherent in nature.


32 posted on 07/01/2014 11:35:04 AM PDT by MikeyB806
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: MikeyB806

If you have to call the loathing animus, then yes it is in nature.

It’s like in the Chiffon Margarine commercials. It is not nice to “Fool Mother Nature” if we may speak in such terms.


37 posted on 07/01/2014 5:37:50 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (Embrace the Lion of Judah and He will roar for you and teach you to roar too. See my page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson