“Your claim that “anti-vaxxers” are emotional thinkers and not rational, is a statement and not a prediction. Actually, it is only an opinion and bears a derogatory stench that I’d expect from a left winger.”
Correct, that one part was a statement (the other was a prediction), and yes it’s my opinion. I really don’t care if you think it’s derogatory, because I consider it an accurate opinion, and I don’t tailor my opinions as to whether they will offend someone or not.
“It is easy to see that your opinions are one-sided and truly rational people will not be swayed by such narrow mindedness.”
Ooh I’m narrow-minded? Are anti-vaxxers a protected group like the homos now? We’re not allowed to observe their behavior and state that they aren’t swayed by scientists telling them that their claims are unfounded, and are therefore not thinking rationally?
“I really don’t care if you think it’s derogatory, because I consider it an accurate opinion, and I don’t tailor my opinions as to whether they will offend someone or not.”
That’s ok by me. It ‘works’ when you are right about an issue, but it makes you look foolish when you are wrong.
“Ooh I’m narrow-minded? Are anti-vaxxers a protected group like the homos now? We’re not allowed to observe their behavior and state that they aren’t swayed by scientists telling them that their claims are unfounded, and are therefore not thinking rationally?”
Yes, you are narrow minded and the other stuff you say is weird, you kinda went off into the weeds there. My niece was OBVIOUSLY damaged by a MMR shot. Do you want to tell her Mother that she is irrational for observing the obvious?
This article is really big pharma B.S. But, you’d have to have studied both sides of this issue to know that. You apparently have not, but seem to claim some weird superiority over the issue.