Wish her mother felt the same way.
1 posted on
06/30/2014 6:40:45 PM PDT by
lbryce
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-37 last
To: lbryce
Pale face speaketh with forked tongue. Not one of us Kemosabe.
24 posted on
06/30/2014 7:09:53 PM PDT by
tflabo
(o)
To: lbryce
Elizabeth Warren and the Progressives prefer to describe the issue of abortifacients as a vague moral issue rather than a freedom of religion issue because they don’t believe in religion and they don’t understand the concerns.
The left saw the issue of forcing support of abortifacients on religious objectors as a wedge issue that could be used as a precedent to to get the government inside the church.
26 posted on
06/30/2014 7:14:18 PM PDT by
Eva
To: lbryce
Warren made a vacuous statement. Apparently, someone told her to sound vaguely vituperatory.
Let's do W next, Liz.
27 posted on
06/30/2014 7:16:36 PM PDT by
OpusatFR
To: lbryce
Democratic Senator Elizabeth Warren Calls Opposition To Abortion A Vague Moral Objection What does she call opposition to murder? How about opposition to rape? Robbery? Assault? Child abuse? Dognapping? Are those more concrete moral objections?
I've always wondered at the "moral" framework that can defend brutal murderers because human life is valuable but then casually abort an unborn child and go for lunch. Where do liberals draw their moral lines? And based on what? Whim? Fashion? Humidity?
29 posted on
06/30/2014 7:24:12 PM PDT by
IronJack
To: lbryce
30 posted on
06/30/2014 7:37:49 PM PDT by
Salvation
("With God all things are possible." Matthew 19:26)
To: lbryce
31 posted on
06/30/2014 7:45:32 PM PDT by
ScottinVA
(If it doesn't include border security, it isn't "reform." It's called "amnesty.")
To: lbryce
vague moral objection??
seriously?
being against the murder of babies is “vague”??
32 posted on
06/30/2014 7:48:21 PM PDT by
GeronL
(Vote for Conservatives not for Republicans)
To: lbryce
Listen, Liz. Your people used to scalp babies and roast them alive so don’t go lecturing us on morality.
34 posted on
06/30/2014 8:06:33 PM PDT by
Texas Eagle
(If it wasn't for double-standards, Liberals would have no standards at all -- Texas Eagle)
To: lbryce
so killing your baby is basic health care now?
35 posted on
06/30/2014 8:15:53 PM PDT by
yldstrk
( My heroes have always been cowboys)
To: lbryce
Typical leftist strawman argument.
To: lbryce
vague moral objection
Vague? Not at all. She's just way too dense to comprehend the "baby killing is murder" connection. Her mother seemed to understand it just fine, however.
38 posted on
06/30/2014 8:54:12 PM PDT by
so_real
( "The Congress of the United States recommends and approves the Holy Bible for use in all schools.")
To: lbryce
a vague moral objection...abortion is the murder of a unique human being - is that specific enough?......
To: lbryce
This, coming from a rep of a party that actually called an unborn child a “tumor.”
Ugh, lecture us on “morals,” Runs with Jackals.
40 posted on
06/30/2014 10:20:34 PM PDT by
tumblindice
(America's founding fathers: all armed conservatives)
To: lbryce
It’s certainly not as vague as her native american ancestry.
41 posted on
06/30/2014 10:35:51 PM PDT by
Cubs Fan
(liberalism is a cancer that destroys everything it gets control of.)
Said the Vaguely Native American.
42 posted on
06/30/2014 10:36:56 PM PDT by
Gene Eric
(Don't be a statist!)
To: lbryce
From a vague pretend Indian.
44 posted on
06/30/2014 11:54:25 PM PDT by
kcvl
To: lbryce
Hope Saint Pete pulls the down lever on this one.
49 posted on
07/01/2014 4:53:18 AM PDT by
Joe Boucher
((FUBO) obammy lied and lied and lied)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-37 last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson