Skip to comments.
Democratic Senator Elizabeth Warren Calls Opposition To Abortion A ‘Vague Moral Objection’
Daily Caller ^
| June 30, 2014
| Tristyn Bloom
Posted on 06/30/2014 6:40:45 PM PDT by lbryce
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-49 next last
To: Senator_Blutarski
Human decency keeps me from saying what I really think about Elizabeth Warren. I'm not nearly as decent as you are so I'll say it....absolute filth,very,very dangerous...every bit as dangerous (and filthy) as Osama Obama *and* the former Twelfth Lady.And very,*very* possibly more.
To: lbryce
What you mean “vague moral objection”, Kemo Sabette?
22
posted on
06/30/2014 7:06:40 PM PDT
by
FlingWingFlyer
(The future must not belong to those who slander bacon.)
To: lbryce
Cant believe we live in a world where wed even consider letting big corps deny women access to basic care based on vague moral objections
Wow. How about that not so vague book called, The Bible, which included the Ten Commandments, one of which is "Thou shall not kill"? That's pretty specific.
23
posted on
06/30/2014 7:09:01 PM PDT
by
Girlene
(Hey NSA!)
To: lbryce
Pale face speaketh with forked tongue. Not one of us Kemosabe.
24
posted on
06/30/2014 7:09:53 PM PDT
by
tflabo
(o)
To: Belteshazzar
From where I sit she's willing to go as far as did Saul Alinsky...and Bill Ayers.
To: lbryce
Elizabeth Warren and the Progressives prefer to describe the issue of abortifacients as a vague moral issue rather than a freedom of religion issue because they don’t believe in religion and they don’t understand the concerns.
The left saw the issue of forcing support of abortifacients on religious objectors as a wedge issue that could be used as a precedent to to get the government inside the church.
26
posted on
06/30/2014 7:14:18 PM PDT
by
Eva
To: lbryce
Warren made a vacuous statement. Apparently, someone told her to sound vaguely vituperatory.
Let's do W next, Liz.
27
posted on
06/30/2014 7:16:36 PM PDT
by
OpusatFR
To: Belteshazzar
She reminds me of the young Vladimir Ilyich Ulyanov sitting in endless numbers of coffee shops - Starbucks? - discussing his ideas with other idealistic but irresponsible folksWhile the Smerdyakov/Stalins listening to her would be the ones to carry her ideas to their logical conclusion and purge her when the time came.
28
posted on
06/30/2014 7:18:57 PM PDT
by
MUDDOG
To: lbryce
Democratic Senator Elizabeth Warren Calls Opposition To Abortion A Vague Moral Objection What does she call opposition to murder? How about opposition to rape? Robbery? Assault? Child abuse? Dognapping? Are those more concrete moral objections?
I've always wondered at the "moral" framework that can defend brutal murderers because human life is valuable but then casually abort an unborn child and go for lunch. Where do liberals draw their moral lines? And based on what? Whim? Fashion? Humidity?
29
posted on
06/30/2014 7:24:12 PM PDT
by
IronJack
To: lbryce
30
posted on
06/30/2014 7:37:49 PM PDT
by
Salvation
("With God all things are possible." Matthew 19:26)
To: lbryce
31
posted on
06/30/2014 7:45:32 PM PDT
by
ScottinVA
(If it doesn't include border security, it isn't "reform." It's called "amnesty.")
To: lbryce
vague moral objection??
seriously?
being against the murder of babies is “vague”??
32
posted on
06/30/2014 7:48:21 PM PDT
by
GeronL
(Vote for Conservatives not for Republicans)
To: ScottinVA
Most liberals are frothing at the mouth for her to run. She is the next great hope.
To: lbryce
Listen, Liz. Your people used to scalp babies and roast them alive so don’t go lecturing us on morality.
34
posted on
06/30/2014 8:06:33 PM PDT
by
Texas Eagle
(If it wasn't for double-standards, Liberals would have no standards at all -- Texas Eagle)
To: lbryce
so killing your baby is basic health care now?
35
posted on
06/30/2014 8:15:53 PM PDT
by
yldstrk
( My heroes have always been cowboys)
To: lbryce
Typical leftist strawman argument.
To: IronJack
I've always wondered at the "moral" framework that can defend brutal murderers because human life is valuable but then casually abort an unborn child and go for lunch. Where do liberals draw their moral lines? And based on what? Whim? Fashion? Humidity?Try a coin toss...
the infowarrior
To: lbryce
vague moral objection
Vague? Not at all. She's just way too dense to comprehend the "baby killing is murder" connection. Her mother seemed to understand it just fine, however.
38
posted on
06/30/2014 8:54:12 PM PDT
by
so_real
( "The Congress of the United States recommends and approves the Holy Bible for use in all schools.")
To: lbryce
a vague moral objection...abortion is the murder of a unique human being - is that specific enough?......
To: lbryce
This, coming from a rep of a party that actually called an unborn child a “tumor.”
Ugh, lecture us on “morals,” Runs with Jackals.
40
posted on
06/30/2014 10:20:34 PM PDT
by
tumblindice
(America's founding fathers: all armed conservatives)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-49 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson