Replies

“The distinction between a community made up of believers in the same religion and one embracing persons of diverse beliefs, clear as it is, constantly escapes the Court’s attention,” she wrote. “One can only wonder why the Court shuts this key difference from sight.”

She is of course referring to a religious community versus a diverse community under a corporation.

Get that?

A business to her is a community.

In her view a business is not so much private property as it is a 'community'.

I would ask her, if the owner of the business were to decide tomorrow to close the doors and shutdown, what then would be the community?

This is the case in a nutshell.

In her view this is not about private property, private ownership or the religious convictions of the business owners, it's about a group of workers meeting on company grounds who she thinks are entitled to things.

This is pure progressive communist thought. It's exactly how Marx laid it out, It's the community of workers that control the fruits of production, in this case the 'benefits'. There is no ownership role to play in the caring and feeding of workers other than a role specified by the state.