Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: alancarp

RE: P.S. - that vaccines thing would be the Jehovah’s witnesses of several decades ago, but apparently they got over whatever whacky ‘Biblical justification’ they had.

Actually vaccines are an objection from Christian Scientists. Jehovah’s Witnesses object to blood transfusions.

But even if the Jehovah’s Witnesses do, where in the constitution does it tell us that a business SHOULD provide this or that healthcare ( or for that matter, ANY HEALTHCARE ) for its employees?

If they don’t, YOU DON’T HAVE TO WORK FOR THEM.


26 posted on 06/30/2014 11:38:27 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]


To: SeekAndFind

Right: I outlined my basic answer in #25 but personally I would go a lot stronger...I’m with you. Given this ruling, then Ginzu got slapped - and she’s complaining, but there’s no justification why Obamacare should trump constitutional protections of any kind. Of course, we have Justice Roberts to thank for that.


35 posted on 06/30/2014 11:42:13 AM PDT by alancarp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson