Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: RJS1950
There were very few fragments of the recent Russian meteor that caused damage. And that's with modern technology that used videos from surveillance cameras at businesses to triangulate on the exact path of the meteor.

No fragments of Tunguska were found. That doesn't mean there weren't some.

/johnny

17 posted on 06/30/2014 10:30:28 AM PDT by JRandomFreeper (Gone Galt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]


To: JRandomFreeper

The fragments were spread out over a large area.

/laplata


20 posted on 06/30/2014 10:37:35 AM PDT by laplata (Liberals don't get it .... their minds are diseased.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

To: JRandomFreeper

Fragments from the recent Russian meteor are few for now because there have been no long term searches for the fragments and also the fact that despite the explosion, it was a small meteor.

Tunguska was a very large event, many times bigger than the recent Russian meteor. The fact that it flattened such a massive area and nothing has been found from multiples searches and explorations says pretty definitively that it was not meteoric in nature. Even the huge rock that hit the Yucatan millions of years ago left plenty of fragmentary evidence.


22 posted on 06/30/2014 10:41:29 AM PDT by RJS1950 (The democrats are the "enemies foreign and domestic" cited in the federal oath)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

To: JRandomFreeper

Maybe Torchwood got there first?


23 posted on 06/30/2014 10:43:55 AM PDT by wally_bert (There are no winners in a game of losers. I'm Tommy Joyce, welcome to the Oriental Lounge.q)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson