To: RJS1950
There were very few fragments of the recent Russian meteor that caused damage. And that's with modern technology that used videos from surveillance cameras at businesses to triangulate on the exact path of the meteor.
No fragments of Tunguska were found. That doesn't mean there weren't some.
/johnny
To: JRandomFreeper
The fragments were spread out over a large area.
/laplata
20 posted on
06/30/2014 10:37:35 AM PDT by
laplata
(Liberals don't get it .... their minds are diseased.)
To: JRandomFreeper
Fragments from the recent Russian meteor are few for now because there have been no long term searches for the fragments and also the fact that despite the explosion, it was a small meteor.
Tunguska was a very large event, many times bigger than the recent Russian meteor. The fact that it flattened such a massive area and nothing has been found from multiples searches and explorations says pretty definitively that it was not meteoric in nature. Even the huge rock that hit the Yucatan millions of years ago left plenty of fragmentary evidence.
22 posted on
06/30/2014 10:41:29 AM PDT by
RJS1950
(The democrats are the "enemies foreign and domestic" cited in the federal oath)
To: JRandomFreeper
Maybe Torchwood got there first?
23 posted on
06/30/2014 10:43:55 AM PDT by
wally_bert
(There are no winners in a game of losers. I'm Tommy Joyce, welcome to the Oriental Lounge.q)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson