sigh… I will clarify. My meaning was that it applied to HL and all closely held for profits, but was distinct from the “accommodation” of non-profits. The discussion I am having in this thread was how this decision relates to non profits. Please I would ask you to read thoroughly through a thread before embarrassing yourself in your exuberance.
I am most definitely no a lib, and am very pleased with this decision.
I never implied you were a Lib. I wrote
“Don’t the Libs wish. LOL!”
Anyhow I’m seeing a few people (possible Trolls), on FR imply that are trying to say this S.C. ruling means nothing or very little for lack of a better words. It’s complete rubbish to say this.