So the fact that MS has a law is what you say is important?
How would you think that MS enforces the law that requires a voter cannot vote for one nominee in the primary and a different nominee in the general? There’s a law you know. How can it be enforced?
You won’t answer will you?
You won’t answer because it’s a law that is useless.
MS has laws that are useless; they don’t matter.
You can say there are laws in MS but many of them don’t matter. They are just ‘nice thoughts’.
Even when it is shown to you that federal rulings invalidate such laws you still cling to it because?
Stubbornness is not a good trait.
Go ahead and get hot under the collar while others sit back and enjoy watching you spin yourself silly.
McDaniel can run as an independent and he can run as a write-in, whichever way he chooses. But right now he is on a path to overturn what happened last week and for good reason. The fraud is thick. He likely won’t need to run as an independent or as a write-in but if he needs to he will be able to.
Do you remember what started all this argument? I will remind you:
I stated that Mississippi law prohibits McLean from running a write-in candidacy. You said I was wrong.
I proved my point, you have conceded that there is such a law - it’s over. Nothing else you have said matters in this debate.
This law is important, because his votes will not be counted if he does not get a court ruling.
PERIOD
Whether he gets that ruling, if it is easy, if it’s not- none of that has any bearing on the fact that the law I said existed, does indeed exist - and it is an easily enforceable law, unlike the one you cite in your latest.
“So the fact that MS has a law is what you say is important?”
Just read what I have actually said and you’ll be better served - and I never said that.
Here is what I have said:
Such a law does exist. And it does exist.
Such a law is important, because it requires McDaniel to get a court ruling, or he won’t get his votes counted.
THAT’S what I’ve said. It is absolutely true.
BTW - I am under no obligation to answer your irrelevant questions. It doesn’t matter what unenforceable laws are out there; because the law I said existed (and it does exist) is EASILY enforceable.
Invalidated laws have no effect. McDaniel must get a court ruling, or his votes will not be counted - in other words, the law will have an effect. Ergo: it is not yet invalidated no matter how many federal rulings you cite.