Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Ancient Man
these same Zulu warriors had slaughtered so many British troops just days before

I understand that's one reason for the successful defense of Rorke's Drift: those Zulus had outrun their supply line and had to pull back.

8 posted on 06/29/2014 7:50:10 AM PDT by Tax-chick (I don't feel obligated to provide you with a non-boring gun.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: Tax-chick

It is true that the 4,000 Zulus at Rorke’s Drift were a phalanx of the 20,000 Zulu army that defeated and killed 1,300 British troops at the Battle of Isandlwana in January, but I’ve never read anywhere that they retreated from lack of supplies.


11 posted on 06/29/2014 8:03:10 AM PDT by Ancient Man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: Tax-chick

I might add that the primary Zulu warrior’s weapon was the assegai iron spear, and while they did possess a few rifles, they weren’t technically trained to use them. Thus, I don’t know what kind of supplies they might have outrun. As Nepalese natives, I’m sure they could have lived off the land, as they had done for centuries.


16 posted on 06/29/2014 8:11:06 AM PDT by Ancient Man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson