Focus, please. I’m looking at tactics and can’t get an answer. I don’t give a flip about Rand Paul’s Iowa inheritance.
The chair was elected by convention delegates. He was ousted by 14 of apparently a 17 member committee. Now, is that democracy or a method of your preferred Republican totalitarian takeover from the delegates vote?
We conservatives here, not Republicans by fiat. This means we are not hostage to Liberals with an “R” on their tail who want the senate at any price.
Rita, are those who left office complaining?
Did those who left office have a hand in drafting the rules by which Party offices are filled?
Were the rules followed?
Should Iowa elected officials have more say over the Party than Rand Paul, who does not live in Iowa?
Did the Central Committee Grant POWER to the 17 who made this decision?
You do not even understand Party Politics or Procedure enough to ask the right questions.